Skip to content

feat(dom): DOM - toHaveClass , toHaveAllClasses and toHaveAnyClass #134

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 6 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fonsiher
Copy link
Contributor

@fonsiher fonsiher commented Oct 3, 2024

Added the toHaveClass matcher.

@fonsiher fonsiher marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2024 20:17
@fonsiher fonsiher force-pushed the feat/dom-have-class branch from 6827334 to 18f9d98 Compare October 4, 2024 20:18
Copy link
Contributor

@ChristianSama ChristianSama left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great @fonsiher. Thank you!

Copy link
Member

@JoseLion JoseLion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good so far, but I think we can improve things if we create 3 assertions instead of one 🙂

* - `exact` (boolean): When true, checks for an exact match of all classes.
* @returns the assertion instance.
*/
public toHaveClass(classNames: string | string[], options: { exact?: boolean; } = {}): this {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What do you think about making more than one assertion instead of adding the options param? To me, it'll provide more readability if we have the following:

expect(elem).toHaveClass("w-full"); // single arg

expect(elem).toHaveAnyClass("w-full", "flex"); // variadic args

expect(elem).toHaveAllClasses("w-full", "flex", "gap-8"); // variadic args

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @JoseLion this is actually a great idea to improve readability. I just added these new matches.

@fonsiher fonsiher force-pushed the feat/dom-have-class branch 2 times, most recently from 6e6062d to a831c90 Compare April 3, 2025 17:34
@fonsiher fonsiher requested review from kdquistanchala, KevinJ1998 and JoseLion and removed request for matycarolina April 3, 2025 17:35
Copy link
Contributor

@suany0805 suany0805 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we rename the PR to contain all the toHaveClass , toHaveAllClasses, toHaveAnyClass 👀 please?

Copy link
Member

@JoseLion JoseLion left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! I left some comments and suggestions. Let me know if you have any questions 🙂

@fonsiher fonsiher changed the title feat(dom): DOM - toHaveClass feat(dom): DOM - ttoHaveClass , toHaveAllClasses and toHaveAnyClass Apr 24, 2025
@fonsiher fonsiher force-pushed the feat/dom-have-class branch from a831c90 to 8805f6f Compare April 28, 2025 22:04
@fonsiher fonsiher changed the title feat(dom): DOM - ttoHaveClass , toHaveAllClasses and toHaveAnyClass feat(dom): DOM - toHaveClass , toHaveAllClasses and toHaveAnyClass Apr 28, 2025
@fonsiher fonsiher force-pushed the feat/dom-have-class branch from 0d3c0c6 to e512c76 Compare April 28, 2025 22:17
@fonsiher
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your review @JoseLion , you're right, I've added the prop to the testing function and now are using getByText for render the element for Testing.
You check this in my last commit. Feel free to take a look at it, and let me know if you have more comments or suggestions. TY.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants